He needs to fucking die.

[Oak]

So then we can agree that the liberal douchebag George Soros funded platypus looking District Attorney from St Louis is way out of line seizing the weapons of law abiding citizens displaying their weapons to a hostile crowd on their own property.

Glad we see eye to eye on that one 

I said IN their house.

Learn to read.

[Biggie Smiles]

I said IN their house.

Learn to read.

I think people have the right to display whatever they want on their property.

hello?

[Oak]

hello?

And I further clarified after your follow up.

I was talking about flags, etc.  Not firearms.  Once that became party of the conversation, then I said IN.


Sorry, it's there. 

I don't want my neighbors walking around outside with firearms.  I wouldn't feel safe going outside.  Fuck that.

[Biggie Smiles]

And I further clarified after your follow up.

I was talking about flags, etc.  Not firearms.  Once that became party of the conversation, then I said IN.

Clarifying and backpedaling are two different things


You originally said people could display whatever they wanted on their own property. The McCloskeys never left their property and all they did was display their weapons. And only AFTER they were threatened by a mob of violent protesters.

Glad we had this talk 

[Blazor]

I think people have the right to display whatever they want on their property.

The public square is no place to laud treasonous racists.

Just to clarify, that flag is neither treasonous nor racist 

[Dovey]

 Omfg.

 Why didnt we hear about this last year?

 https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/south-asia/former-high-profile-un-aid-official-peter-john-dalglish-jailed-for-child-abuse-in

 Because no one gives a fuck. That's why.

 I hope the world fucking burns.

[Blazor]

Clarifying and backpedaling are two different things


You originally said people could display whatever they wanted on their own property. The McCloskeys never left their property and all they did was display their weapons. And only AFTER they were threatened by a mob of violent protesters.

Glad we had this talk 

I dont think they even left their front porch.

Btw, I dont think it was reported on here, but before they had their rifle taken away, the mob had come back, and had rifles pointed on their front door. Like an attack squad almost.

After the rifle was taken away, a local gun shop gave them one for free lol. Even offered free lessons on how to use it lol 

[Blazor]

Omfg.

 Why didnt we hear about this last year?

 https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/south-asia/former-high-profile-un-aid-official-peter-john-dalglish-jailed-for-child-abuse-in

 Because no one gives a fuck. That's why.

 I hope the world fucking burns.

Its not that no one gives a fuck, THEY control the media, and what we are exposed to. If it doesnt fit THEIR agenda, we are denied that information.

[Dovey]

Its not that no one gives a fuck, THEY control the media, and what we are exposed to. If it doesnt fit THEIR agenda, we are denied that information.

 Yet every single discussion on every venue I've tried to start one on immediately becomes about things people find very important.

 Flags, monuments and make believe racism.

 We actually have MORE slavery in the world right now than at any point in human history and people are still focused on "righting the wrongs" of 100 years ago while children are sold right now.  Keeping police isnt even worth it for this, either.  In fact enabling trafficking is probably one of the real reasons.

[Joe]

https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/south-asia/former-high-profile-un-aid-official-peter-john-dalglish-jailed-for-child-abuse-in

He looks kinda evil & sinister, eh Dovey?



...those crooked eyebrows and the fang-like teeth.

And here he is with our Prime Minister:

[Blazor]

Yet every single discussion on every venue I've tried to start one on immediately becomes about things people find very important.

 Flags, monuments and make believe racism.

 We actually have MORE slavery in the world right now than at any point in human history and people are still focused on "righting the wrongs" of 100 years ago while children are sold right now.  Keeping police isnt even worth it for this, either.  In fact enabling trafficking is probably one of the real reasons.

You mean discussing this subject? Maybe folks just dont wanna talk about filthy pedos lol. Its a HUGE problem with the elites though, they are heavy into "Child sacrifices" and such.

Believe me, I feel ya, you are right about modern slavery.

Man, I was at a party last night, drunk as fuck, when the host's wife asked me if I flew a Confederate flag lol. Now Im suppose to read some Libtard book hahaha. There was no talking with her, I was wrong in her eyes. Thankfully we kept it civil.

[Dovey]

You mean discussing this subject? Maybe folks just dont wanna talk about filthy pedos lol. Its a HUGE problem with the elites though, they are heavy into "Child sacrifices" and such.

Believe me, I feel ya, you are right about modern slavery.

Man, I was at a party last night, drunk as fuck, when the host's wife asked me if I flew a Confederate flag lol. Now Im suppose to read some Libtard book hahaha. There was no talking with her, I was wrong in her eyes. Thankfully we kept it civil.

 We need to focus on it.

 If not we are lying to ourselves. We are human rights hypocrites.

[Joe]

I agree with all that.

 But I fail to see how being outraged by child rape and child porn is anywhere near equitable to the dumb outrage over flags and statues.

 So Joe are you saying that we shouldnt get so bent up over child porn? Let people have Confederate flags and leave statues alone (which I agree with, btw) but also chill our jets on child porn and just let people have all the child rape videos and pics they want?

 I'm really failing to see how the flags and statues have anything to do with child porn 

 I posted an article about a BLM organizer being in possession of child porn and said if someone really wants police gone.....there just may be other motives for that than the mainstream narrative.

 I have no idea how outrage over child porn
.....which is actually something we SHOULD be outraged over.....is suddenly lumped in with flags and statues. Or considered something silly to be uptight about.

 This is just fucked up.

Y'know Dovey, maybe I don't get worked up about this topic because I never seek out child porn.

In fact, it never crosses my mind as children or young teens don't turn me on.

Truth be known, they rather annoy me, as they probably do most men.

Yah sure, put up with them, tolerate 'em, but they're not 'sexy' imho.

Y'know, there was a good scene in the movie American graffiti, where the roadster John picks up this 13 year old teenybopper.

He's not really attracted to her & finds er annoying, puts up with her.

But of course his real desire is to pick up and be with some hot young woman, not be with a 'little girl'.

[Dovey]

Y'know Dovey, maybe I don't get worked up about this topic because I never seek out child porn.

In fact, it never crosses my mind as children or young teens don't turn me on.

Truth be known, they rather annoy me, as they probably do most men.

Yah sure, put up with them, tolerate 'em, but they're not 'sexy' imho.

Y'know, there was a good scene in the movie American graffiti, where the roadster John picks up this 13 year old teenybopper.

He's not really attracted to her & finds er annoying, puts up with her.

But of course his real desire is to pick up and be with some hot young woman, not be with a 'little girl'.

 So you are saying the only people who should get outraged about child porn are people who watch child porn?

 You dont think society has an obligation and responsibility to protect our weak and vulnerable from predators? To stand up and ensure a bright, healthy future generation?

 I think people who think like this deserve the future on the horizon when all the children we turned our eyes from are now the ones leading the world and culture.

 Let's fuck the world. Destroy humanities future. Sounds awesome.

[Joe]

So you are saying the only people who should get outraged about child porn are people who watch child porn?

 You dont think society has an obligation and responsibility to protect our weak and vulnerable from predators? To stand up and ensure a bright, healthy future generation?

 I think people who think like this deserve the future on the horizon when all the children we turned our eyes from are now the ones leading the world and culture.

 Let's fuck the world. Destroy humanities future. Sounds awesome.

Same time, men seeking out what we consider today underage girls has been around a lot longer than we care to think.

For example, it was not uncommon for men to marry 15 year old girls at one time.

Even younger than that. And it wasn't even illegal.

Much of what we consider today as abhorrent, was respectable back then.

What I've noticed, is a lot of classical art seems to make references to pedophilia.

ie - paintings of naked children, babies dressed up a angels or cherubs.
 in 18 or 19tch century art.

I think there was more pedophiles among those Great Masters than we care to think.

The French painter, Paul Gaugin had a 12 or 13 year old Tahitian wife.

There were noted literary figures who had 12 year old mistresses.

Not saying any of this was desirable, but it existed.

What's notable in today's society, is how men are now all vilified and perceived of as potential predators.
Ie, I went to this online conference, SIGGRAPH (www.siggraph.org), to register for it & during the registration process, the website prompts the user that if they intend to 'attend' it (it's not being held in person due to the coronavirus), that they refrain from sexual harassing behaviour.

I mean, c'mon - an online conference which is only viewable on the Internet? Who the heck am I gonna possibly harass when I can't even meet them? This is how toxic our society has become. Society seems to say it can't even trust men, so much as tapping on a keyboard or computer console. Anyways, when I attended these conferences live in person in the past, these questions never came up. And now I'm not sure if I even want to bother to register if I can't be trusted behind a computer screen.

Similarly when I was working with the local school board as a contract worker taking care of disabled children, I had to undergo a criminal check, fingerprinting, etc to certify that I was not a pedophile. All that bullshit for some menial job. That employer actually wants me to come back, but I figger with all those hoops to go through just to take care of or even get physically abused by a bunch of self-centred, self-entitled annoying brats, it's not worth it.

We've all become guilty and adopted Joseph Stalin's mentality - "Better to imprison 1 million innocent people, than to let 1 guilty one go free."

[Dovey]

 Child rapists need to be publically executed.

 That's fact.

[Biggie Smiles]

Same time, men seeking out what we consider today underage girls has been around a lot longer than we care to think.

For example, it was not uncommon for men to marry 15 year old girls at one time.

Even younger than that. And it wasn't even illegal.

Much of what we consider today as abhorrent, was respectable back then.

What I've noticed, is a lot of classical art seems to make references to pedophilia.

ie - paintings of naked children, babies dressed up a angels or cherubs.
 in 18 or 19tch century art.

I think there was more pedophiles among those Great Masters than we care to think.

The French painter, Paul Gaugin had a 12 or 13 year old Tahitian wife.

There were noted literary figures who had 12 year old mistresses.

Not saying any of this was desirable, but it existed.

What's notable in today's society, is how men are now all vilified and perceived of as potential predators.
Ie, I went to this online conference, SIGGRAPH (www.siggraph.org), to register for it & during the registration process, the website prompts the user that if they intend to 'attend' it (it's not being held in person due to the coronavirus), that they refrain from sexual harassing behaviour.

I mean, c'mon - an online conference which is only viewable on the Internet? Who the heck am I gonna possibly harass when I can't even meet them? This is how toxic our society has become. Society seems to say it can't even trust men, so much as tapping on a keyboard or computer console. Anyways, when I attended these conferences live in person in the past, these questions never came up. And now I'm not sure if I even want to bother to register if I can't be trusted behind a computer screen.

Similarly when I was working with the local school board as a contract worker taking care of disabled children, I had to undergo a criminal check, fingerprinting, etc to certify that I was not a pedophile. All that bullshit for some menial job. That employer actually wants me to come back, but I figger with all those hoops to go through just to take care of or even get physically abused by a bunch of self-centred, self-entitled annoying brats, it's not worth it.

We've all become guilty and adopted Joseph Stalin's mentality - "Better to imprison 1 million innocent people, than to let 1 guilty one go free."

you've obviously invested considerable time into researching the subject.

And that's creepy.

Any man in his 40's that finds a 16 year old suitable for mating purposes is a sick fuck. End of story.

I personally wouldn't give the time of day to a woman under 38 at this point in my life. I want a woman who thinks like a woman. Not a bimbo who thinks like a child.

[Joe]

Child rapists need to be publically executed.

 That's fact.

Well OK.

Unfortunately, this culture of vindictiveness towards men has also led a culture of self-entitled children/youngsters who use sexual harassment as a weapon to demonize them.

Like - what about children now who make false claims of sexual harassment/predation? There have been cases where children wilfully lied and it was later discovered that their claims of assault were false.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_allegation_of_child_sexual_abuse

Sure - protect the victims - but don't you think the accusers need to be held accountable as well?

[Dovey]

you've obviously invested considerable time into researching the subject.

And that's creepy.

Any man in his 40's that finds a 16 year old suitable for mating purposes is a sick fuck. End of story.

I personally wouldn't give the time of day to a woman under 38 at this point in my life. I want a woman who thinks like a woman. Not a bimbo who thinks like a child.

 MGTOW would be so disappointed in you, liking us expired wall hitters 

[Biggie Smiles]

MGTOW would be so disappointed in you, liking us expired wall hitters 

what is "MGTOW" ?