Re: MAN CRUSH - Freddy Mercury

[AMF]

I sure hope you guys are aware of the distinction between the Gospels which offer a narrative about how Jesus practiced HIS religion, and the epistles which show Paul trying to gin up HIS religion ABOUT Jesus.

Also of course there is a lot of semi-credible scholarship suggesting that Paul was a closeted fagit, though probably a repentant one.  He sure as hell wasn't "healed" though.

[lokmar]

I sure hope you guys are aware of the distinction between the Gospels which offer a narrative about how Jesus practiced HIS religion, and the epistles which show Paul trying to gin up HIS religion ABOUT Jesus.

Also of course there is a lot of semi-credible scholarship suggesting that Paul was a closeted fagit, though probably a repentant one.  He sure as hell wasn't "healed" though.

I've heard all the Paul/Saul wedge related issues. Simple thing is, you either accept the New Testament or you dont. Picking the gospels from the rest and you may as well reject it all. I accept it all.

As far as air claims of "faggit", I heard abe lincoln was one, Jesus was one, I'm one, YUO're one, etc, etc, etc. I've called johnny faggit dozens of times and I'm semi credible +++!

[lokmar]

I always wondered why it's kosher for a male to stick his dick in a female's mouth and or arse, but that isn't a part of reproduction.... yet a male doing it in the same holes of a male version is suddenly bad by nutty religious doctrine.

No baby making chance there either...

...same kind of orifices...

Apparently satanic or something...

Where in the fuck did you read in the Bible that banging your woman in the rear was acceptable? Thats a good way for a man to get a prostate infection real bad, not to mention a perforated bowel for the woman!

[The Queen Bee]

Christians do it all the time... in fact, young Catholic girls go to it first...

I can speak on this ...

[AMF]

I've heard all the Paul/Saul wedge related issues. Simple thing is, you either accept the New Testament or you dont. Picking the gospels from the rest and you may as well reject it all. I accept it all.

Membership in my church is only predicated on accepting Jesus as Lord and Savior.  I am also asked to accept the Confessions (16 of them) and the Bible as a sufficient guide to faith and practice.  There is no orthodoxy in my denomination and very little doctrine or dogma.  I say this so you can see the Louisville Slugger coming for you when you say doctrinaire shit like the above.

[lokmar]

Membership in my church is only predicated on accepting Jesus as Lord and Savior.  I am also asked to accept the Confessions (16 of them) and the Bible as a sufficient guide to faith and practice.  There is no orthodoxy in my denominatin and very little doctrine or dogma.  I say this so you can see the Louisville Slugger coming for you when you say doctrinaire shit like the above.

Maybe plastic castrated jesus build its house without the foundation of God but ACTUAL Jesus built His house on the Word of God which includes condemnation for murder, faggotry, adultery, idol worship, and a whole host of other things. Oh yea, and execution of children who are dunken reckless assholes who beat up the town and act uncivilized. I'm for that FYI.

[AMF]

According to Matthew, what he built his house on was the fact that Peter was able to receive DIRECT REVALATION about Jesus's divinity.  I dunno why you're looking in the OT for the Word when John tells you plainly that the Word took on flesh and dwelt here for a while. 

[lokmar]

According to Matthew, what he built his house on was the fact that Peter was able to receive DIRECT REVALATION about Jesus's divinity.  I dunno why you're looking in the OT for the Word when John tells you plainly that the Word took on flesh and dwelt here for a while.

Because Jesus didnt come to tear down what God built.

[AMF]

That's a false analogy.  Of course he didn't but what he DID come here for was to fulfill the OT and to teach us how to be children of God. 

[AMF]

I can speak on this ...

Pray do.

[Dovey]

 Best way to prevent religious dogma and man centered religion is know the Word of God.

[Dovey]

Nope. You read the letters to the churches again for yourself. Its simple and very clear. They are not to be brought in and if they are tolerated inside the church, Christ Himself will cut em off. BTW, if your preacher raises kids that are fuck ups, you need to toss his ass out of the leadership position too.

I have read them Lok and I quote them often. Key sentence in your post? "Letters to the church". The dealt with issues WITHIN the body. They addressed those who made up the church and were already believers. Not the lost coming to Christ.

[Dovey]

Your example supports what I am saying. Note how she was ready to repent and cast aside her life of sin. Personally, I'd still keep an eye on her. If she's going to church on Sunday and turning tricks on Monday, giver her the boot! Jesus said so!

So if you in sin(by apathy towards unborn children in the first trimester, lust, porn, et) you should be "kept an eye on" and booted when you sin as well. It's not just the sins YOU dont like.

[Baby Doll]

concerning the topic title, That new Freddy Mercury movie got panned. The Susperia remake is better.

Lokmar, your dogma barks but has no teeth.

[deport_liberals]

[lokmar]

So if you in sin(by apathy towards unborn children in the first trimester, lust, porn, et) you should be "kept an eye on" and booted when you sin as well. It's not just the sins YOU dont like.

I'm ok with that. Better to boot my degenerate ass than the church lose its way. You have mis-stated my position. I'd not ban first tri but that in no way indicates I think its right, moral, etc. I'd also not ban alcohol, and drugs.

[lokmar]

concerning the topic title, That new Freddy Mercury movie got panned. The Susperia remake is better.

Lokmar, your dogma barks but has no teeth.

By all means, elaborate.

[lokmar]

You'll not find a lib that wants to have a serious discussion about what to do with the Folsom Street Fair.

[TweeterInChief]

And this is exactly why I'm so sickened by gays. If I murdered someone, my family would disown me. If I kidnapped for ransom, the same. If I left my wife and kids for a younger woman, my rep would never recover even if I werent disowned. If I decided to put man ass on my menu, if my family didnt accept it, THEY would be ostracized by society. The true evil of homosexuality is that saying "whats wrong with loving people" is a huge lever used to decapitate morality. I dont say this lightly: Homosexuality is more evil than murder!

You sound like someone I know who went through gay conversion therapy.  He came out super manly like you!  Go team homo-turned-hetero!  They're the best heteros we've got!

[lokmar]

You sound like someone I know who went through gay conversion therapy.  He came out super manly like you!  Go team homo-turned-hetero!  They're the best heteros we've got!

Prolly because it was Christian based. Most solid Christians are cognizant of how evil homosexuality and atheism are. Both are worse spiritually than murder.

I noticed you didnt have any comments on the validity of my post. Is that because my examples are spot on?