0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Figuratively speaking, Peachypoos...
So I assumed. mang. But see what you did? Now we've attracted a semi-literate buttsecks freak into the conversation. Fuck, I'll probably have to move the thread.
Look who's talking morality out of one side of his mouth, and violent anal penetration out of the other side.
A thoughtful read about arguments for and against communism and capitalism with some analysis on the motives of anti-communist rhetoric.KINDLY AVOID TURNING THIS INTO YET ANOTHER ONE OF THOSE MUD SLINGING TROLL THREADS....TIAhttps://aeon.co/essays/the-merits-of-taking-an-anti-anti-communism-stance
A 2009 poll in eight east European countries asked if the economic situation for ordinary people was ‘better, worse or about the same as it was under communism’. The results stunned observers: 72 per cent of Hungarians, and 62 per cent of both Ukrainians and Bulgarians believed that most people were worse off after 1989. In no country did more than 47 per cent of those surveyed agree that their lives improved after the advent of free markets. Subsequent polls and qualitative research across Russia and eastern Europe confirm the persistence of these sentiments as popular discontent with the failed promises of free-market prosperity has grown, especially among older people.
Anyway, the anti-communism stance is a weak troll that usually starkly reveals the perpetrator's ignorance on the topic.
The concept of Communism is a weak troll...
Try reading the article, and perhaps your posts will hold at least a little weight.
I read it and it didn't change my mind. You can't polish a turd and the concept of Communism is a morally repugnant pile of shit adhered to by ethics challenged losers.
Why is it that Lady Peaches’ threads always descend into a discussion about gay sex?He must be back on the viagra again.
Why don't you ask Mr Kind of Full of BS to mansplain it to you. He knows what's what!
I have no idea on what you just said (and you're meant to be an accredited teacher)...
